Museum Studies PhD seeking help for Literature Review chapter

[MichaelWriter54536813]

I find myself at a crossroads - how can I effectively intertwine these elements in my research? My focus on Heritage Methods, Preservation Theory, and Cultural Analysis has shed light on the complexities of preserving intangible heritage within communities.

The struggle lies in balancing theoretical frameworks with practical methodologies that truly engage stakeholders while respecting diverse cultural perspectives. based on my research, i ponder how other scholars have navigated this 🛡 terrain.

How have they addressed the ethical considerations of cultural heritage preservation? What innovative approaches have been employed to foster meaningful community involvement in preservation efforts? As I shape my Literature Review, I aim to not only critique existing literature but also uncover gaps where my research can contribute significantly.

This notion resonates deeply as I seek ways to blend theory and practice in heritage preservation strategies. Any insights or experiences shared would be invaluable as I strive to craft a comprehensive and impactful Literature Review chapter

 

[Neiza]

The theory/practice struggle is SO real and honestly? That tension IS the interesting part. For my lit review, I started grouping sources not by "theory vs practice" but by the questions they were asking. Some ask "what should we preserve?" others ask "who benefits from preservation?" and others ask "how do we preserve?" Once I stopped trying to force them into categories they didn't fit, the connections started appearing naturally. Might work for you? Also, Laurajane Smith's work on "authorized heritage discourse" might be relevant if you haven't read her already.